Avontae Guiden: Article Plan
This article comprehensively examines the legal challenges faced by Avontae Guiden, encompassing a Shreveport shooting incident, a federal firearm charge under 18 USC 922(g)(1), and a conspiracy to obstruct justice charge.
Overview
Avontae Guiden, a 17-year-old, faces serious legal ramifications stemming from a shooting on Birch Drive, a federal firearm charge, and allegations of conspiring to obstruct justice by destroying potential evidence.
Avontae Guiden’s legal troubles began with a shooting incident on Birch Drive in Shreveport, where he was identified as a suspect and subsequently arrested. This led to an attempted first-degree murder charge. Further complicating matters, Guiden faced a federal indictment for firearm possession, specifically violating 18 USC 922(g)(1), due to a prior conviction.
Adding to these charges is a conspiracy to obstruct justice charge under 18 U.S.C. 1512 (c) (1) & (k), alleging that Guiden conspired to destroy evidence, namely photographs on his iCloud account. He was also booked in Bossier Parish as a fugitive. These interwoven cases create a complex legal battle for Guiden, spanning both state and federal jurisdictions.
Shreveport Shooting Incident
The Shreveport shooting incident involved Avontae Guiden as a suspect after Tarickeous Savannah was shot on Birch Drive. Guiden later turned himself in to the police.
Initial Reports of the Shooting on Birch Drive
Initial reports detailed a shooting on the 2800 block of Birch Drive in Shreveport. The incident occurred around 4:30 p.m. on a Sunday, involving gunfire that struck Tarickeous Savannah, an 18-year-old, twice in his upper body. Savannah was walking with a group when the shots were fired.
Emergency services responded to the scene, and Savannah received medical attention for his injuries. The Shreveport Police Department immediately launched an investigation to determine the circumstances surrounding the shooting and identify any potential suspects. Early information suggested the incident was not a random act, prompting detectives to explore possible motives and connections.
Avontae Guiden Identified as a Suspect
Following the initial investigation into the Birch Drive shooting, detectives identified Avontae Guiden, a 17-year-old, as a suspect. Information gathered during the early stages of the inquiry led law enforcement to focus on Guiden as a person of interest in connection with the incident. The specific details that implicated Guiden were not immediately released to the public.
Detectives pursued leads and gathered evidence to build a case against Guiden. The identification of Guiden as a suspect marked a significant development in the investigation, prompting law enforcement to intensify their efforts to locate and apprehend him for questioning regarding his alleged involvement in the shooting.
Guiden’s Arrest and Booking
Subsequent to being identified as a suspect in the Birch Drive shooting, Avontae Guiden turned himself in to Shreveport Police headquarters. Following his arrival at the police station, Guiden was formally arrested by law enforcement officials. After the arrest procedure, Guiden was officially booked into the Shreveport City Jail.
The booking process involved recording Guiden’s personal information and the charges against him into the jail’s system. Guiden faced charges related to the shooting incident, specifically attempted first-degree murder. The booking marked the beginning of the formal legal proceedings against Guiden, placing him in the custody of law enforcement.
Federal Firearm Charge
Avontae Guiden faced a federal charge for firearm possession. This stemmed from an indictment under 18 USC 922(g)(1), concerning possessing a firearm after a prior conviction punishable by over one year.
Indictment for Firearm Possession (18 USC 922(g)(1))
On or about June 24, 2023, within the Western District of Louisiana, Avontae Guiden was indicted for violating 18 USC 922(g)(1). The indictment states that Guiden, knowing he had a prior conviction punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year, knowingly possessed a firearm affecting commerce. This federal charge highlights the legal ramifications of possessing a firearm with a criminal record.
The case underscores the strict enforcement of federal laws regarding firearm ownership. Guiden’s legal team challenged the indictment, leading to a motion to dismiss Count One. This charge is central to the legal proceedings against Guiden, adding complexity to his case. The details of the indictment are outlined in court documents, marking a significant phase in the legal battle.
Motion to Dismiss Count One
Avontae Guiden’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss Count One of the indictment, which charges him with possessing a firearm in violation of 18 USC 922(g)(1). This motion argues against the validity of the firearm possession charge, potentially challenging the evidence or legal basis upon which the indictment was founded. The motion seeks to have the charge dropped entirely, which would significantly alter the course of the legal proceedings.
The outcome of the motion to dismiss is crucial for Guiden’s defense, as it could remove a key element of the prosecution’s case. The court’s decision on this motion will have implications for the subsequent stages of the trial.
Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice Charge
Avontae Guiden faces a charge of conspiracy to obstruct justice under 18 U.S.C. 1512 (c) (1) & (k), involving alleged attempts to conceal or destroy evidence.
Details of the Conspiracy Charge (18 U.S.C. 1512 (c) (1) & (k))
The indictment against Avontae Guiden includes a charge of conspiracy to obstruct justice, specifically violating 18 U.S.C. 1512 (c) (1) and (k). This charge alleges that on or about July 26, 2023, within the Western District of Louisiana, Guiden conspired with another individual to corruptly alter, destroy, mutilate, and conceal a document. The document in question is identified as photographs located on Guiden’s iCloud account. The prosecution contends that Guiden and the other individual acted with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation and potential prosecution related to other alleged offenses. This conspiracy charge adds a layer of complexity to the legal proceedings against Guiden, focusing on actions taken after the initial alleged crimes.
Alleged Attempt to Destroy Evidence (iCloud Photographs)
A key component of the conspiracy to obstruct justice charge against Avontae Guiden revolves around the alleged attempt to destroy evidence, specifically photographs stored on his iCloud account. Prosecutors assert that Guiden conspired with another individual to corruptly alter, destroy, mutilate, and conceal these photographs. The government believes that these images contained information relevant to the ongoing investigations and potential prosecutions related to other alleged crimes involving Guiden. The alleged attempt to delete or tamper with the iCloud photographs forms a significant part of the obstruction of justice case, suggesting an effort to hinder law enforcement’s ability to gather crucial evidence. The nature and content of the photographs remain central to understanding the full scope of this charge.
Bossier Parish Booking
Avontae L. Guiden was booked in Bossier Parish on July 11, 2023, on a fugitive charge. At the time of his booking, Guiden’s age was recorded as 23 years old.
Fugitive Charge in Bossier Parish
Avontae L. Guiden faced legal consequences in Bossier Parish, Louisiana, stemming from his booking on July 11, 2023. The primary charge leading to his detainment was that of being a fugitive from justice. Records indicate that Guiden was 23 years old at the time he was booked into the Bossier Parish jail. The specific details regarding the jurisdiction from which he was considered a fugitive are currently unavailable but the existing booking information confirms the nature of the charge levied against him.
This fugitive charge suggests that Guiden was sought by law enforcement in another jurisdiction, prompting his apprehension and subsequent booking in Bossier Parish. Further investigation into the originating jurisdiction and underlying reasons for the fugitive warrant may reveal additional details about the circumstances surrounding his arrest. The resolution of this charge likely involved coordination between law enforcement agencies to determine extradition or other legal proceedings.
Court Cases and Legal Proceedings
Avontae Guiden is involved in USA v. Guiden (5:23-cr-00258) in the Western District of Louisiana. He also has a case filed in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on October 22, 2024.
USA v. Guiden (5:23-cr-00258)
The case of USA v. Guiden, identified as 5:23-cr-00258, is currently being processed in the Louisiana Western District Court. Documents related to this case were initially filed on October 25, 2023, and are accessible through PACER, a system for accessing federal court records. This case involves Avontae Guiden and likely pertains to the federal charges he is facing, including the firearm possession charge under 18 USC 922(g)(1) and the conspiracy to obstruct justice charge under 18 U.S.C. 1512 (c) (1) & (k). The details within the court documents will provide a comprehensive understanding of the allegations, evidence, and legal arguments presented in this particular case. The outcome of this case will significantly impact Guiden’s legal standing and potential consequences.
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Case (Filed October 22, 2024)
On October 22, 2024, a case involving Avontae Guiden was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The specifics of this case are currently unknown, but it logically follows the initial district court case (USA v. Guiden 5:23-cr-00258). This appeal suggests that Guiden or the prosecution is challenging a previous ruling or decision made in the lower court regarding one or more of the charges he faces. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will review the legal arguments, evidence presented in the original case, and potentially hear new arguments. The outcome could affirm the lower court’s decision, reverse it, or remand the case back for further proceedings. This appeal represents a critical stage in Guiden’s legal journey.